Tarot funny thing i was thinking of posting th same question by angeleyes
hi moonglow i was actually wondering that myself
i thought or actully read somewhere that when you can interpret one set of cards you can read any cards(including the traditional 52 set of playing cards)
i tend to use the same set all the time(angel tarot by stuart r kaplan u.s games) however during my studies and research i compiled a sort of journal or book based on each card
i used interpretations from other sources(rachell pollock tarot for beginners, handll major arcanna, as well as alisons course and this site)along with the original meanings that accompany the cards
i dont know if ive done the right thing or not but i feel ive got a better understanding of the cards by doing this
i also agree with you that it can be confusing when you get conflicting meanings for the same card so maybe each deck is supposed to be used and interpreted with the accompanying booklet as the author intended
oh i dont know,lol
i think im more confused than when i started this post, hope i didnt confuse you any more, lol!!!
other posts in this tarot thread
Different decks by Moonglow
by karen
Hi Moonglow
by Mysti
by Moonglow
funny thing i was thinking of posting th same question by angeleyes
by Mysti