Tarot by WolfChild
It seems to me that what HH is saying is that you cannot really say you are "reading the tarot" if you do not include all the cards in the tarot deck
You may be giving a reading, and that reading may help you or your client, but you are not actually "reading the tarot" without all the cards
It would be like saying you were "playing chess" if you removed the pawns or the bishops or any other piece before you started
You would not technically be playing chess, then, by definition
On the other hand, I have heard of people doing a reading using only the major arcana
This, then, could not be called "reading the tarot" either, right?
other posts in this tarot thread
A basic question by Tim
by HH
by gypsy
by WolfChild
by Mysti
Court cards by Celeste
by Tim
by HH
by bluemoon
by Tim
court cards by anjo
by Mysti
yes by anjo
by Mysti
by karen
by HH
it was just my opinion by anjo
by karen
by HH
by HH
by bea
by HH
by bluemoon
sorry by anjo
by Tim
by HH
truth?? by anjo
by HH
by anjo
by HH
FORUM RULES by ADMIN
by anjo
by HH
by anjo
by HH
by anjo
Terminology counts by HH
by anjo
by WolfChild
by HH
by anjo
by HH