Tarot by HH
If we assume the truth of the paradoxx's premises, we have to grant that the truth of the conclusion is very likely
But is it a good argument? Or is it rhetorical argument based on less than sound evidentiary formula? Ignorance of the laws, even if reasonable, is [b]not[/b] a defense
other posts in this tarot thread
finding decks in Singapore by jan50jan
by HH
by jan50jan
by HH
by jan50jan
by HH
by jan50jan
by HH
by jan50jan
by WolfChild
by HH
by jan50jan
by WolfChild
by HH
by WolfChild
by HH
by jan50jan
by HH
by HH
by gypsy
by HH
by paradoxx
by HH